Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philip Hjorth vs Viktor Durasovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hjorth vs Durasovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Philip Hjorth vs Viktor Durasovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hjorth 0 - 0 Durasovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hjorth has won 48.2% of points on his second serve, while Durasovic has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hjorth, in recent form, has won 51.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Durasovic has won 52.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.83% and 34.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hjorth has saved 54.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Durasovic has saved 56.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hjorth has won 63.83% of matches played (W/L 30/ 17), with Durasovic winning 46.97% (W/L 31/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hjorth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Durasovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 166/ 98), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Hjorth has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Durasovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hjorth has played against opponents with an average rank of 63.57 while Durasovic has played against players with an average rank of 237.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hjorth has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Durasovic has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hjorth has converted 53.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Durasovic has converted 41.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
484
Rank
298
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
55% (39-32)
Career Total W/L
54% (346-297)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
55% (21-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$14,785
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philip Hjorth | Viktor Durasovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 55% (21/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (30/18) | 54% (49/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (252/202) | 51% (446/425) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 67% (8/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 154 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 101 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 30.52 | 229.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (528/851) | 58% (1572/2692) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (345/528) | 68% (1066/1572) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (159/323) | 51% (574/1120) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (43/76) | 41% (119/288) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (336/802) | 41% (1133/2761) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (14/9) | 58% (14/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 55% (21/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 26% (19/5) |
Philip Hjorth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Nino Toto
Player
Philip Hjorth
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Philip Hjorth
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Giovanni Calvano
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrick Kaukovalta
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Patrik Munkhammar
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Filip Stidell
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Walters
Player
Philip Hjorth
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Philip Hjorth
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Francisco Rocha
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Hjorth
Player
Rodrigo Fernandes
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Durasovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Parizzia
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
106
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Viktor Durasovic
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Henrik Bladelius
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Matija Pecotic
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaylan Bigun
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hjorth Vs Durasovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
